Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Forum New posts Recent Posts Search forums. Articles New articles Series Search articles.
If this is to be said it needs to be very carefully argued: degrading or exploitative sexual depiction of course is wrong and few if any have a genuine erotic interest in such nonesense. Bukkake however has strong and distinct aesthetic content, is completely harmless and an erotic and powerful experience for the woman- it's highly defendable and people are getting seriously confused by the wider context of Western sexual repression and the conflation of sexual activity with unequal power relations. The men are intimately giving themselves to the woman- she takes from them not vice versa. But there is video. Since the video is pornographic how do I cite? Is it really proper to introduce the article with the words "Bukkake can also mean a Japanese noodle preparation method [ I always thought that the whole "feudal Japan wife-punishment" thing involved the woman being buried in sand up to her neck, with her husband ejaculating on her face before beheading her with a sword.
That is awesome! One of the best innovations in group fun since the sleepover. I tested this toy out with some of my best girlfriends, and they all enjoyed being splattered with ooze. The only downside is your hand gets a might tired after pumping your gun during long durations, so be sure to have a friend to help you pump it out.
Does the DMV have people whose job it is to examine requests for personalized license plates and screen out risque or mischievous ones? Is it just me, or is the whole notion of the vanity plate lame? It's a pet peeve of mine